Ever since Mr. Christopher Neyor published his Open Letter to President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf last week, there has been a torrent (flood, violent flow) of accusations and counter accusations among government officials and even sponsored by the Ministry of Information, Culture and Tourism.We think this is most unfortunate, for it is tantamount to “washing our dirty clothes” in public, which is totally unnecessary. Only people in slums, who have no washing facilities within their homes, do that—and most do so in the back, not the front yard.But here we are—Mr. Neyor and the government itself, spilling it all out there, on the front pages of the newspapers, and on the airwaves, too!Whom is this hurting? Not Mr. Neyor, who has already, by his Open Letter, opened himself up to a barrage of revelations, criticisms and attacks, true or untrue; not President Sirleaf, who has already reacted in a somewhat restrained fashion—only because she was approached for her side of the story. No, it is hurting Liberia and her government. We say that because here we had critical negotiations between two sovereign governments, Kuwait and Liberia, having taken place, only see some of these exposed in public—and not simply that, but exposed in a vicious and acrimonious manner.Question: When will we ever be able to get the Kuwaitis to sit with us again in any negotiations for any reason? But doing what we have done, we have created in the minds of many governments and international institutions serious apprehensions about how serious, sensible, mature and considerate we are when dealing with development partners.Let us return to Mr. Neyor’s Open Letter and reflect on what the Daily Observer and other parts of the Liberian media have been arguing about the importance of transparency in government.We have constantly frowned upon shady deals in government circles, of many GOL Ministries and Agencies of not coming clean to the media and the public, yea the Liberian people, about what government is doing. This seems to have been going on from the very beginning of the operations of this most vital sector, petroleum and the company that manages it, the National Oil Company of Liberia (NOCAL). That is why it was possible, in the very beginning, for one Nigerian businessman to walk away with US$250 million without investing a cent in Liberia. All he did was to buy one of the oil blocks, then resell it to Chevron and walk away with that staggering amount, made off of Liberia’s resources, without the Liberian people knowing anything about it. The President has had to higher several persons to head both the National Oil Company itself and its Board of Directors. After she removed Dr. Foday Kromah she appointed Mr. Neyor and after him Dr. Randolph McClain. As for the Board, it was first headed, under Ellen, by Mr. Clemenceau Urey, who was summarily removed to install her son Robert Sirleaf. That appointment was greeted with an avalanche of local and international criticism, but she remained stoic about it until she could no longer withstand it, and replaced him with her Legal Advisor, Counselor Seward M. Cooper.It seems that even up to this day the public has little knowledge of the workings of NOCAL. This newspaper has reliably learned that there is still very serious speculation about exactly WHO is running NOCAL, even as we know that Dr. McClain is still its President and Counselor Cooper its Board Chair. Is there, as is being talked about behind the scenes, an unseen hand calling the shots at NOCAL?We have indeed heard at least one name, but for legal considerations, we dare not mention it.Here again we reassert the need for transparency and accountability in government, to save the President herself and her government from the exact same situation that gave rise to Chris Neyor’s Open Letter.Here again we are confronted with stark reality of the Biblical dictum: “The truth shall make you free.”Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
With much emphasis being place on the building of social cohesion among the multicultural and multiethnic Guyanese populace, Political Commentator, Dr David Hinds believes cricket can single-handedly unite the people of this diverse country as it once did in the past.He was at the time speaking in a panel discussion during the taping of ‘The Factor’ programme aired on Television Guyana (TVG). The topic was based on how culture can impact social cohesion among Guyanese.During the discussions with former Culture, Youth and Sport Minister, Dr Frank Anthony and Leader for ROAR, Ravi Dev, Dr Hinds pointed out that as a young boy growing up in an African-Guyanese community, cricketers such as Rohan Kanhai and Shivnarine Chanderpaul – both of whom are East Indian – were not seen as East Indians symbols but as a symbol of hope for Guyanese.He reasoned that these single moments, when looked back on, are what governments should harness to truly achieve social cohesion.“As a policymaker, I would put so much resources into developing cricket because it is one of the few areas that we can have social cohesion inside of Guyana and… across the Caribbean,” the Alliance For Change (AFC) Executive Member posited.Dr Hinds was at the time commenting on the fact that in all its years of independence, Guyana is yet to view outside of itself and as part of the West Indian culture. This, he said, is where Guyana most relates to and finds a uniqueness about its culture.It was in light of this that he believes cricket is that key factor to promote social cohesion in Guyana. He stated that when Kanhai and Chanderpaul were playing cricket, they were expressing a ‘West Indianess’ – something which has proven to bind not only Guyanese but Caribbean people.“One of the things about our independence is that we are yet to define in a really serious way who we are as a Guyanese and as a West Indian people. I keep saying West Indian because part of it is that we exist not only as Guyana,” he remarked.Moreover, the political commentator is of the view that investments in activities such as cricket augur well for the Guyanese society, especially since society is plagued with crime and drifting from its young people.“I can tell you that if we can engage (young people’s) energies – their creative energies – in a very serious way, that becomes a big deterrence to young people going adrift.So I think, we are badly in need of a cultural policy because our economics will go nowhere, our politics will go nowhere until people’s humanity are expressed,” he stated.According to Dr Hinds, in order to draft such a policy, there needs to be widespread consultation. He said a cultural commission of some sort needs to be established with cultural ambassadors, and not necessarily politicians, who will go into communities and engage the people about what they would like to see in a national cultural policy and how they would like to see it constructed.