Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter George H. W. Bush and his wife, Barbara, were married 73 years, the most years of any presidential couple. That is truly amazing! Mama Mia December 2, 2018 at 7:31 pm Free webinar for job seekers on best interview answers, hosted by Goodwill June 11 Support conservation and fish with NEW Florida specialty license plate December 2, 2018 at 7:22 pm December 2, 2018 at 6:22 pm Mama Mia December 2, 2018 at 6:56 pm Please enter your name here The Anatomy of Fear Mama Mia Reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. I never thought that Daddy Bush would out live Mrs. Bush. It is a sad day, when our former presidents pass away. He was a fine man, even though I didn’t share many of his political stances, but he definitely was very well qualified to hold the presidency. He would never have done the scandalous things that this current president says, and does. No comparisons, as to their integrity! I know it will be an unhappy Christmas season for his family, with Daddy Bush gone. May he rest in peace. Please enter your comment! 4 COMMENTS Florida voters passed the ban on off-shore oil drilling this last election. And yet, I see that Trump has signed to allow seismic testing, down the Atlantic coast to search for oil and gas deposits under the ocean floor. The problem is that this harms, injures, harasses, and even kills the marine wildlife, such as the whales, dolphins, sea turtles, etc. Endangered marine animals also. God knows, Trump is no animal lover! And we already have the Navy out there blasting away, and we have seen large whales washing ashore dead, but the Navy claims it wasn’t from their explosive testing. It is a disgrace, what is being done out there in the ocean. So many times I see the photos of hundreds of whales who have beached themselves, and died, and the reports usually don’t say what caused them to do that, but there is obviously more to the story than we aren’t told. TAGSGeorge HW Bush Previous articleDorothy Day – ‘a saint for our times’Next articleOrlando area remains in the #2 spot for Florida’s international homebuyers Denise Connell RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Reply LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply Governor Rick Scott, what a jerk he is! He has suspended the Broward County Supervisor of Elections, Brenda Snipes, AFTER she had already submitted her resignation letter, from her job, which would of be effective Jan. 4th, 2019. There are no elections between now and then. No cause to not let the woman keep her job, until her resignation, to retire. BUT Rick Scott, the jerk, wants to knock her out of her 71,000 dollar state pension, that is why he did it!!! And she worked years for that pension! That is not right! And to appoint a replacement person, in Snipes position, until the next election, which the voters will choose who they want as the county supervisor election position. I am not mad at the guy that Scott picked to replace her, I don’t know anything about him, and what I have read about him, he seems okay. It is Rick Scott, the low- down jerk, I am mad at!! He should have been thankful that he got elected Senator (if he did, who knows,?) and remained cool, and let Ron De Santis, the Florida Governor-Elect pick the next replacement for the Broward County Supervisor, BUT NO, RICK SCOTT IS A MEAN- SPIRTED TOTAL JERK! His reason to suspend Snipes was that the taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay money for a supervisor of election official until she resigns (even though she was still working)……this from Mr. Ethics, himself, and his, and his former healthcare company, and what they were allegedly accused of with taxpayer’s money!!!! That,” I plead the fifth”….how many times??? Millions, and millions of taxpayer fraud! Now, Brenda Snipes is mad, and has rescinded her resignation letter…..and I don’t blame her one bit! And just look at that Sean Hannity interview on Fox with Scott, dated Nov. 9th, 2018, and Scott was going to certify the Florida elections the next day, Nov. 10th, even though the votes were not all tallied, and by- mail ballots had not all come in, like I pointed out to you all before on here. He is a jerk! This is just like Trump, who fired the FBI guy, who had already announced his retirement, to knock him out of his federal pension. Sorry, can’t think of the FBI guy’s name, but it wasn’t Comey. Yes, Rick Scott and Trump are definitely, two of a kind, that AREN’T kind! Reply You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here Mama Mia Reply By James Goldgeier, Professor at the School of International Service and Visiting Senior Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations, American University School of International Service and first published on theconversation.com.George H.W. Bush was the last person elected president of the United States with any prior foreign policy experience.President George HW BushBush, who has died at age 94, entered office with one of the most impressive resumes of any president, having served as director of the Central Intelligence Agency, ambassador to the United Nations and Ronald Reagan’s vice president.He left office with an impressive list of achievements, including managing the peaceful collapse of the Soviet Union and the unification of Germany. But a major high point of his presidency was also the harbinger of disappointments to come: the swift military victory that reversed Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait and seemed to herald a new era in world affairs – but left Saddam Hussein in power.In 1991, it seemed America could do anything it wanted to in the world. Twenty-seven years after Bush left Saddam Hussein in power, United States forces are still engaged in Iraq, and the US is far less confident of its global role.A New World Order?Bush with Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev at Camp David on June 2, 1990. AP Photo/Marcy NighswanderA month after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, in September 1990, Bush and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev issued a joint statement noting that “no peaceful international order is possible if larger states can devour their smaller neighbors.” That same month, Bush declared, “We’re now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders.”The problem was that while the United Nations was set up to prevent powerful states from invading weaker neighbors, as Germany and Japan had done in the 1930s and 1940s, the main challenges of the post-Cold War world – prior to Russia invading Ukraine in 2014 – were different. They were mainly internal challenges: failed states and civil wars in places like Somalia, Rwanda, Balkans, Afghanistan and eventually Iraq after the disastrous U.S. occupation following the 2003 war.The U.S. effort to put together an international coalition against Iraq in 1990 was stunning. Secretary of State James Baker met with every head of state or foreign minister whose country held a seat on the U.N. Security Council. That meant not just meeting with those countries that had permanent seats like the Soviet Union and China, but also those holding rotating seats such as Ivory Coast, Romania and even Cuba.Baker’s efforts were successful. The Security Council passed U.N. resolution 678 on Nov. 29, 1990 and established Jan. 15, 1991 as the deadline for Iraq to withdraw its troops from Kuwait or face a U.S.-led international coalition to force its withdrawal.The coalition made good on the threat. As Colin Powell told my co-author Derek Chollet and me in an interview for our book on the period, “The Gulf War was the war against the Russians we didn’t have. There were no trees and no hills, but that’s what we were trained to fight. The Iraqis sat there and we kicked the shit out of them.”For those who had suffered through the morass of Vietnam and the crisis of American confidence that followed, it was the ultimate feel-good moment. An estimated 800,000 people packed the National Mall to cheer their military heroes. Bush came out of the war with a 90 percent public approval rating.And yet, the following year, a candidate with no foreign policy experience who had avoided military service in Vietnam won the presidency. He defeated the incumbent president who was himself a war hero and had led the Gulf War coalition to such success. By 1992, the Cold War was over, and Bill Clinton campaigned with the mindset that it was “the economy, stupid.”But while Clinton defeated Bush, he inherited the Iraq problem from his predecessor, who had chosen not to remove Saddam Hussein in order to keep his U.N. coalition together. Clinton was faced for eight years with patrolling the no-fly-zones established over the north and south of Iraq to protect the Kurdish and Shiite populations.Clinton passed the Iraq problem off to George W. Bush, who in the aftermath of the attacks of Sept. 11 went to war in 2003 – this time without U.N. authorization. Bush and his “coalition of the willing” removed Saddam Hussein, leaving the United States as an occupying power. And while Barack Obama promised – a promise on which, for a fleeting moment, he seemed to deliver – a U.S. withdrawal from the country, he was forced to go back in militarily with the rise of the Islamic State, handing off the Iraq problem to his successor to manage.Thus the promise of the Gulf War – the U.S. dominant like no other since ancient Rome, confident that it could rule the world on behalf of freedom and democracy – gave way over time to doubt and confusion. In the post-Cold War world, the U.S. military was largely called upon to handle internal conflicts – in Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Libya and, throughout it all, Iraq – and the results have proved deeply dissatisfying.In 1991, George H.W. Bush declared victory and celebrated with a parade. In 2011, there was no parade for Libya. There will be no parade for Afghanistan. Stability in Iraq remains elusive – the US could not celebrate a clear-cut military victory there.It’s fitting that George H.W. Bush, World War II military hero and Cold War veteran, was the last president to preside over what at the time felt awesome: a major military victory fought on behalf of the entire world against a dictator. Instead, his successors, none of whom served in the military and all of whom have wrestled with post-Cold War challenges, have been vexed not only by Iraq but by challenges posed by nonstate actors while trying to manage regional threats emanating from China, Russia, and Iran. While Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama and now Donald Trump have each in their own way tried to define American leadership, George H.W. Bush’s presidency represents the moment at the end of the Cold War when anything seemed possible for the United States in world affairs, and the underlying challenges were only just beginning to become visible.
Scarred shells of polar pteropod Limacina helicina collected from the Greenland Sea in June 2012 reveal a history of damage, most likely failed predation, in earlier life stages. Evidence of shell fracture and subsequent re-growth is commonly observed in specimens recovered from the sub-Arctic and further afield. However, at one site within sea-ice on the Greenland shelf, shells that had been subject to mechanical damage were also found to exhibit considerable dissolution. It was evident that shell dissolution was localised to areas where the organic, periostracal sheet that covers the outer shell had been damaged at some earlier stage during the animal’s life. Where the periostracum remained intact, the shell appeared pristine with no sign of dissolution. Specimens which appeared to be pristine following collection were incubated for four days. Scarring of shells that received periostracal damage during collection only became evident in specimens that were incubated in waters undersaturated with respect to aragonite, ΩAr≤1. While the waters from which the damaged specimens were collected at the Greenland Sea sea-ice margin were not Ω Ar ≤1, the water column did exhibit the lowest ΩAr values observed in the Greenland and Barents Seas, and was likely to have approached ΩAr≤1 during the winter months. We demonstrate that L. helicina shells are only susceptible to dissolution where both the periostracum has been breached and the aragonite beneath the breach is exposed to waters of ΩAr≤1. Exposure of multiple layers of aragonite in areas of deep dissolution indicate that, as with many molluscs, L. helicina is able to patch up dissolution damage to the shell by secreting additional aragonite internally and maintain their shell. We conclude that, unless breached, the periostracum provides an effective shield for pteropod shells against dissolution in waters ΩAr≤1, and when dissolution does occur the animal has an effective means of self-repair. We suggest that future studies of pteropod shell condition are undertaken on specimens from which the periostracum has not been removed in preparation.
View post tag: sailors Australian Sailors to Use 3-D Avatars to Train on Ships That are Currently Under Construction View post tag: train View post tag: Australian View post tag: that Sailors will be able to use 3-D avatars to train on ships that are currently under construction thanks to cutting edge simulation technology being used in Australia.Minister for Defence Materiel Jason Clare visited KBR in Canberra to see first hand a demonstration of the virtual Landing Helicopter Dock Ship (LHD), created using CryEngine® 3 — software developed for computer games.KBR have been contracted by Defence to create the interactive, three-dimensional replica of the first LHD scheduled to be delivered in the middle of the decade – HMAS Canberra.Up to 100 personnel at any one time can use this virtual ship to participate in simulated exercises and emergency response scenarios from all over the country without having to be in the same location.“This is like Play Station with a purpose,” Mr Clare said.“KBR have combined gaming technology and the plans of the LHDs to create a state-of-the-art 3-D model of the Navy ship currently under construction.”Mr Clare said innovations like this virtual ship represented the future of military training.“These LHDs are different to any ship the Navy has ever sailed and this simulation gives sailors a head-start on training to operate the ship.“It means our sailors can start learning how to operate these new ships years before they begin operations.“Helicopter pilots can land a virtual helicopter and Navy engineers can train on the ship’s virtual engines.“The level of detail is incredible — sailors can even find the bunk they’ll sleep in on board.“This can save time and money in the training and operation of these ships.”The hull of the first LHD was launched in February in Spain where it is being constructed by Navantia.The hull of the first ship will arrive in Melbourne next year for further work to be completed at the Williamstown Shipyard before it becomes operational in late 2014. Australia’s second LHD will become operational the following year.The LHDs will be the largest ships the Navy has ever operated, eclipsing Australia’s last aircraft carrier, HMAS Melbourne.Each ship is 230 metres long and can carry a combined armed battlegroup of more than 1000 personnel, 100 armoured vehicles and 12 helicopters. They also include a 40-bed hospital.[mappress]Source: navy, June 14, 2011; Back to overview,Home naval-today Australian Sailors to Use 3-D Avatars to Train on Ships That are Currently Under Construction View post tag: 3-D View post tag: construction View post tag: Avatars View post tag: Naval View post tag: use View post tag: Navy View post tag: Currently View post tag: ships View post tag: News by topic Equipment & technology View post tag: under June 14, 2011 Share this article